Monitoring the activities of Italian colposcopy clinics before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of healthcare reorganization during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic on Italian colposcopy clinic activities, focusing on cervical excision procedures, follow-ups for conservative management of low-grade lesions, and follow-ups post cervical excision. METHODS: Retrospective study conducted in 14 Italian colposcopy clinics. The number and clinical characteristics of cervical excisions, follow-ups for conservative management of low-grade lesions, and follow-ups after cervical excision were compared between the period March 1, 2019 to February 29, 2020 (pre-pandemic) and March 1, 2020 to February 28, 2021 (pandemic) with a Poisson regression analysis. RESULTS: In the pandemic period, the number of cervical excisions was reduced by 8.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]=-15.6% to -2%; p=0.011). Excisions were less frequently performed in the operating room (-35.1%; 95% CI=-47.6% to -22.6%; p<0.001), the number of patients from spontaneous screening was reduced by -14.0% (95% CI=-23.4% to -4.6%; p=0.003), and the CO2-laser technique was used less frequently (-30%; 95% CI=-45.1% to -15.0%; p<0.001). As compared to the pre-pandemic period, the number of follow-ups for conservative management of low-grade lesions was reduced by -26.7% (95% CI=-39.0% to -14.4%; p<0.001), and the follow-up appointments after cervical excision were reduced by -51.0% (95% CI=-58.1% to -43.9%; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The most significant impact of the healthcare reorganization during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was on follow-ups after cervical excision. The resumption of disrupted activities should follow a risk-based prioritization, starting from women in follow-up after cervical excision. It is advisable that the trend of performing cervical excision as an outpatient procedure is maintained in the post-pandemic period.

One-year evolution of DLCO changes and respiratory symptoms in patients with post COVID-19 respiratory syndrome.

PURPOSE: During a follow-up program of patients admitted for COVID-19 at our non-ICU Unit, we found that 37% of them had decreased diffusing lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) 3-6 months after discharge. This prospective observational study aimed to evaluate the evolution of changes in DLCO and respiratory symptoms at the 1-year follow-up visit. METHODS: Seventeen (mean age 71 years; 8 males) of 19 eligible patients (DLCO < 80% of predicted at the 3-6 months follow-up visit) completed the 1-year follow-up visit. One patient refused to participate and 1 patient had died 3 months earlier from myocardial infarction. The visit included a self-reported structured questionnaire, physical exam, blood tests, ECG, and spirometry with DLCO. RESULTS: Mean DLCO was significantly improved at the 1-year visit (from 64% of predicted at 3-6 months to 74% of predicted at 1 year; P = 0.003). A clinically significant increase in DLCO (10% or greater) was observed in 11 patients (65%) with complete normalization (> 80% of predicted) in 6 (35%); in the other 6 (35%) it remained unchanged. The prevalence of exertional dyspnea (65-35%, P = 0.17), cough (24-18%, P = 1), and fatigue (76-35%, P = 0.04) decreased at the 1-year visit. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that DLCO and respiratory symptoms tend to normalize or improve 1 year after hospitalization for COVID-19 in most patients. However, there is also a non-negligible number of patients (about one-third) in whom respiratory changes persist and will need prolonged follow-up.

Effectiveness and safety of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the treatment of COVID-19-associated acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a single center, non-ICU setting experience.

The role of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) is uncertain, as no direct evidence exists to support NIPPV use in such patients. We retrospectively assessed the effectiveness and safety of NIPPV in a cohort of COVID-19 patients consecutively admitted to the COVID-19 general wards of a medium-size Italian hospital, from March 6 to May 7, 2020. Healthcare workers (HCWs) caring for COVID-19 patients were monitored, undergoing nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 in case of onset of COVID-19 symptoms, and periodic SARS-CoV-2 screening serology. Overall, 50 patients (mean age 74.6 years) received NIPPV, of which 22 (44%) were successfully weaned, avoiding endotracheal intubation (ETI) and AHRF-related death. Due to limited life expectancy, 25 (50%) of 50 NIPPV-treated patients received a "do not intubate" (DNI) order. Among these, only 6 (24%) were weaned from NIPPV. Of the remaining 25 NIPPV-treated patients without treatment limitations, 16 (64%) were successfully weaned, 9 (36%) underwent delayed ETI and, of these, 3 (33.3%) died. NIPPV success was predicted by the use of corticosteroids (OR 15.4, CI 1.79-132.57, p 0.013) and the increase in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio measured 24-48 h after NIPPV initiation (OR 1.02, CI 1-1.03, p 0.015), while it was inversely correlated with the presence of a DNI order (OR 0.03, CI 0.001-0.57, p 0.020). During the study period, 2 of 124 (1.6%) HCWs caring for COVID-19 patients were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Apart from patients with limited life expectancy, NIPPV was effective in a substantially high percentage of patients with COVID-19-associated AHRF. The risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCWs was low.